Skip to main content

Finance

SAM.gov Resources for Vermont Local Governments

SAM.gov is the federal government's official system for entity registration and award management. If your municipality applies for federal grants, receives federal funding, or works with federal agencies, maintaining an active and accurate SAM.gov registration is an important administrative responsibility.

Many Vermont municipalities encounter questions about renewing registrations, managing entity administrators, or responding to validation and compliance requirements. While these processes are essential for accessing federal funding opportunities, they can also be confusing and time-consuming.

VLCT has developed a variety of resources to help local officials navigate SAM.gov requirements. This page brings those resources together in one place, providing guidance for every stage of the process—from obtaining a UEI and completing an initial registration to renewing your account and resolving common issues.

Whether you are setting up a new municipal registration, preparing for a grant application, or troubleshooting an existing account, these resources can help you understand requirements, avoid common pitfalls, and keep your municipality eligible for federal funding opportunities.

Use the links below to find the information most relevant to your situation.

Are you having difficulties with your SAM.gov registration? Is your registration inactive? Has the person with administrative privileges for your account left municipal service? 

This resource assists municipalities with finding answers to their most frequently asked questions about SAM.gov (a.k.a. SAM). In most cases, the questions link directly to SAM's Frequently Asked Question (FAQ).

VLCT Resource: Answers to SAM.gov Frequently Asked Questions | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

Login.gov and SAM.gov are both official U.S. government websites, but they serve different purposes. It’s important to know how they work – especially if you’re a municipal official or volunteer helping with grants or federal programs.

Learn more at Understanding the Difference Between Login.gov and SAM.gov | Vermont League of Cities and Towns.

If your SAM (System for Award Management) registration becomes inactive, it must be reactivated. An inactive status can affect your eligibility for federal funding, such as FEMA Public Assistance and some transportation and community development grants and loans.

Learn about the steps you can take to reactivate the account: What Should We Do if Our SAM.gov Account Becomes Inactive? | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

If SAM.gov asks for a NAICS code when you renew your municipality's registration, you've inadvertently chosen to renew as a business rather than a municipality. 

Find out how to fix this error at Is SAM.gov Asking for a NAICS Code During Your Registration Renewal? | Vermont League of Cities and Towns.

Publication Date
06/23/2026

Elective Pay Resource Center

The federal Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 opened federal tax credits and incentives to municipalities and other tax-exempt entities through a mechanism known as "Elective Pay". Eligible local governments may receive the value of certain federal tax credits as a refund payment from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), helping offset the cost of qualified energy projects, such as solar arrays, energy storage, geothermal projects, and others.

For Vermont municipalities, Elective Pay can help make investments in clean energy, energy efficiency, vehicle electrification, and other eligible projects more affordable, making Elective Pay an important funding tool to include in your planning process.

Because Elective Pay is tied to federal tax credits, the rules, eligibility requirements, documentation standards, and filing procedures can be complex. Municipal officials often need to understand not only whether a project qualifies, but also how to meet federal requirements throughout project planning, procurement, construction, and reporting.

This Resource Center brings together VLCT guidance and articles to help municipalities:

  • Understand how Elective Pay works.
  • Identify projects that may qualify for federal tax credits.
  • Understand prevailing wage, apprenticeship, and other program requirements.
  • Learn about changes that have occurred since 2025.
  • Learn about pre-registration, filing, and compliance requirements.

The information provided here is intended to support municipal decision-making and project planning. Because federal guidance may change and each project presents unique circumstances, municipalities should consult current IRS guidance and seek professional tax, legal, or financial advice when appropriate.

Explore the resources below to learn how Elective Pay may help your municipality advance energy projects while reducing local costs.

Link: Tax Incentives Municipalities Can Use to Further Their Energy Goals | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

This webpage describes:

  • available tax credits,
  • what municipalities can do to increase the amount they can claim, and
  • details to know before launching a project.

Link: Key Changes to Tax Incentives for Municipal Energy Projects | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

This webpage describes:

  • changes affecting municipal projects, and
  • action steps municipal officials can take.

Link: IRS Tightens Timeline for Energy Tax Incentive Eligibility: What Municipal Leaders Need to Know | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

This webpage describes:

  • the new IRS definition for "Beginning of Construction",
  • the change from "continuous efforts" to "continuous construction",
  • what projects the changes apply to, and
  • planning considerations that can help municipalities retain eligibilty for the credits.

Link: Claiming Tax Incentives for Your Clean Energy Project | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

The webpage describes:

  • successful examples of Vermont municipalities using the credit,
  • step-by-step actions to take to claim a credit,
  • a sample timeline for claiming a credit, and
  • resources available to help municipalities claim their refund.

Link: Grants and Elective Pay: Understanding the Rules | Vermont League of Cities and Towns

This webpage:

  • describes how grants affect your elective pay refund claim,
  • provides simple examples, and
  • describes why the rule exists and what it means for projects.
Publication Date
06/23/2026

Health Insurance Costs: Making the HDHP Math Work for Municipalities

Member for

3 years 5 months
Submitted by kbuckley@vlct.org on

Rising healthcare costs continue to squeeze municipal budgets, forcing local officials to balance fiscal responsibility with the need to offer competitive, reliable coverage to employees. One increasingly common strategy is to move from a traditional, fully insured low‑deductible plan to a High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) paired with either a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or a Health Savings Account (HSA).

The basic idea is straightforward: HDHPs have lower monthly premiums but higher deductibles and out‑of‑pocket limits. If a municipality can capture enough premium savings and redirect part of that savings into an HRA or HSA, it may reduce its total health insurance costs while still shielding employees from a big jump in financial risk.

Under an HRA, the municipality alone funds an employer‑controlled account that reimburses employees for eligible medical expenses, up to a set limit. Under an HSA, the employee owns the account; both employer and employee can contribute (within IRS limits), funds roll over from year to year, and balances can be invested. HSAs also offer strong tax advantages, making them a powerful long‑term benefit.

The financial test for cash‑strapped municipalities is simple: do the premium savings from the HDHP exceed the dollars you commit to the HRA or HSA?

A four‑step comparison can answer that:

  1. Gather your data. For each coverage tier (Single, Two Person, Adult + Children, Family), list your current annual employer premium cost and the proposed HDHP annual employer premium. Decide how much you would contribute to an HRA or HSA for each tier.
  2. Calculate premium savings. Subtract the HDHP annual employer premium from the current annual employer premium. If the result is positive, the HDHP is cheaper on premiums and there is room for savings.
  3. Subtract HRA/HSA contributions. From that savings amount, subtract the annual HRA or HSA contribution you plan to make. If the result is still positive, the HDHP/HRA or HDHP/HSA approach reduces your total employer cost for that tier.
  4. Review the employee impact. Compare deductibles, out‑of‑pocket maximums, and how much of the higher HDHP deductible you are offsetting with HRA/HSA dollars. The goal is to create budget relief for the municipality without exposing employees to unreasonable financial risk.

A simple side‑by‑side chart can help you visualize the tradeoffs. In a sample scenario where the employer pays 100% of premiums and funds an HRA, the municipality sees net savings per contract across all tiers—even after setting aside HRA dollars—because the HDHP premium reduction is large enough.

For municipalities under intense budget pressure, this kind of structured analysis offers a disciplined way to explore plan design changes instead of across‑the‑board cuts or cost shifting. It can also support productive conversations with unions and employees when you can demonstrate that part of the premium savings will be reinvested to protect them.

Want to take a deeper dive into strategies for using HDHPs to reduce health insurance costs?  

Then check out our Resource: High Deductible Health Plans (HDHP) - A Simple Cost Comparison Tool for Municipalities.


VLCT’s Health Insurance Advisory Services (HIAS) program can assist members with this analysis. HIAS offers education on plan options, financial modeling of HDHP/HRA and HDHP/HSA designs, support throughout enrollment, and up‑to‑date guidance on ACA and other legal requirements. For an annual fee, VLCT members can access these services and get help presenting options to boards, managers, and employees.

To learn more about HIAS, contact Kelley Avery, Senior Benefit Programs Administrator, at 1‑800‑649‑7915 or kavery@vlct.org.

 


Authored By

Kathleen Ramsay, Municipal Operations Specialist

Model Trustees of Public Funds Investment Policy + Guidance

Vermont law provides that money held in trust by a town for any purpose, including cemetery trust funds, shall be under the charge and management of trustees of public funds unless the person giving the funds directs otherwise. 24 V.S.A. § 2431. It also provides that the income derived from investment of the money must be applied by the trustees to the purpose for which the trust is held. 24 V.S.A. § 2432(a).

Given the fiduciary position held by the trustees of public funds, it is important that they adopt a policy to guide their actions and investment decisions. The primary purpose of such a policy should be to strike a balance between risk and return while following a conservative investment approach that provides appropriate income to meet the trust’s objectives. The model investment policy for trustees of public funds establishes investment objectives, standards of investing prudence, eligible investments, reporting requirements, and safekeeping and custodial procedures necessary to properly manage and invest trust funds.

When seeking guidance on investment of trust moneys, trustees should look first to the trust document. Frequently, one who places money in trust with a town also places conditions on how and where such trust moneys can be invested. Trustees must also follow Vermont law, which establishes specific investment vehicles appropriate for investment of town trust moneys. These investment requirements are set out at 24 V.S.A. § 2432(b) and in the model policy.

For additional information, see the discussion of the Model Investment Policy. For more information on municipal investment policies, please refer to Financial Policies: Design and Implementation, published by the Government Finance Officers Association. A copy of this document can be purchased at www.gfoa.org.

Publication Date
06/11/2026

Model Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Policy + Guidance

Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Policy Guidance

The VLCT Municipal Assistance Center developed this model accounting, auditing, and financial reporting policy to help municipalities effectively manage government finances. Voters approve a budget and hold the municipal officers accountable for its proper management. If officials don’t know how financial resources are being used, or whether they are being used to accomplish the voters’ goals as represented in the budget, those officials have failed to fulfill their important role as stewards of public funds.

An accounting, auditing, and financial reporting policy sets the tone for fulfilling this stewardship role. Every town should aspire to establish and maintain high standards for its accounting practices. Such standards inspire confidence in the financial information that is produced and presented to voters. They enable the voters, selectboard, and other officials to make sound decisions in preparing and adopting the town budget and managing town finances.

The following should be considered in the development of an accounting, auditing, and financial reporting policy:

Accounting Standards. Vermont statutes provide no legal standard for municipal government accounting. Unfortunately, the lack of a common standard has resulted in a wide variation in accounting practices among Vermont municipalities. For municipalities seeking to standardize their accounting practices, the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for local governments, established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) are a helpful guideline. GASB is the independent organization that establishes and improves standards of accounting and financial reporting for U.S. state and local governments. GASB is generally recognized by governments, the accounting industry, and capital markets as the official source of generally accepted accounting principles for state and local governments.

The generally accepted accounting principles for local governments promulgated by GASB can assist municipalities in providing officials and voters with financial statements that can be analyzed and compared from period to period. It also provides comparability across municipalities, something that cannot be accomplished now with the variety of reporting formats used throughout the state. There is also less room for error and fraud when specific uniform standards are applied to the accounting process. This adds up to better reporting, more accountability, and, one hopes, more informed and supportive voters.

Compliance with GAAP requires the establishment of a fund accounting system and measuring the financial position and results of operations using the modified accrual basis of accounting for governmental fund types and the accrual basis of accounting for proprietary and fiduciary fund types. For more information about GASB and GAAP for local government, please visit www.gasb.org.      

Independent Auditing. Hundreds, if not thousands, of transactions are posted to town books each year, including complex payroll and benefits payments. While compliance with generally accepted accounting practices helps ensure that transactions are accurately booked and reported, mistakes and even fraud can still occur. Independent auditors can review the municipality’s accounting system, along with the town’s internal controls, and conduct field tests by taking transactions from a trial balance (listing all account balances including revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities) and tracking down the source documents to be sure that everything has been processed properly and recorded correctly.

The purpose of this review is to determine if the financial statements are free of “material misstatement.” In this regard, an independent auditor will offer an opinion on whether or not the financial statements fairly represent the true financial condition of the town. A management letter is also provided, reporting any material weaknesses in the accounting system – things the auditor considers important enough to be addressed and corrected, such as inadequate documentation of payments being processed or bank accounts not being reconciled. Other reportable conditions that are not deemed to be material are also listed in the management letter and may include items such as lack of an approval process for journal entries or inadequate documentation of accounting processes.

Vermont law requires that a town have auditors, whether appointed or elected. These officials are charged with examining the accounts of town officers and reporting their findings in writing to the voters through the annual town report. 24 V.S.A. §§ 1682, 1683. The amount of time auditors must give to perform their duties depends upon the size of the municipality and the complexity of its budget. The responsibilities of the office may exceed the capacity of local volunteers, and some municipalities have been unable to find persons willing to hold the office. In such instances, a town may vote to eliminate the office of auditor. 17 V.S.A. § 2651b. If the town does vote to eliminate the office, the selectboard must contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant licensed in this State to perform an annual audit of all town funds. 

Even where local auditors have not been eliminated, it is a good practice for municipalities to have their financial statements regularly audited by an independent accounting firm. An outside auditor can be hired upon motion of the selectboard or vote of the town. 24 V.S.A. § 1690(a). In addition to determining whether the financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with GAAP, an outside audit will also review a town’s procedures and internal controls for weaknesses or deficiencies and make recommendations for improvements. While it is helpful to have an independent audit prepared on an annual basis, such a service can be expensive and not every town can afford to have an audit every year. Accordingly, the policy should specify the frequency of the independent audit.

Financial Reporting. In practice, Vermont local government typically follows a four-step

Financial management process centered on the annual town budget. The selectboard, usually with input from the town treasurer, undertake preparation of the proposed budget prior to the annual town meeting. The budget is adopted by the voters at the annual meeting and is managed through the fiscal year by the selectboard and other municipal officers having authority to draw orders on the treasurer. Finally, the auditors evaluate the performance of these officers and report this information back to the voters through the town report.

The selectboard carries out its responsibility to manage the town budget under its authority to approve orders for payment of town funds. 24 V.S.A. §§ 1576, 1621, 1622. In order to do so, the selectboard must have timely and accurate information about the status of the town’s finances. The treasurer is obligated to keep accounts “of moneys paid out by him for the town,” and such accounts “shall at all times be open to the inspection of persons interested.” 24 V.S.A § 1571. The treasurer is also required to provide quarterly reports to the selectboard regarding these actions, and “annually on or before June 30th provide the selectboard the State Auditor of Accounts document regarding internal financial controls.” 24 V.S.A. § 1571(c),(d).

Additional financial reports are important because they give the selectboard and other officials a snapshot of where the municipality stands financially at any given point in time. A Budget Report shows where the town stands in relation to its budget. It is a report of revenues collected and appropriations expended with a column for the variance in each line item – how much the town is either over or under what was budgeted. The Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance details revenues and expenditures and shows the difference between the two – either a surplus if the town has more revenue than anticipated or a deficit if it has more expenditures. It shows the beginning fund balance and adds the surplus (or subtracts the deficit) to give the ending fund balance. The Balance Sheet shows the municipalities’ assets, then looks at those assets in terms of the amount that is debt (liabilities) and the amount that is not debt (fund balance). The fund balance reflected on the Balance Sheet should match the ending fund balance from the Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance.

The town’s annual report should include financial statements prepared in conformance with GAAP reporting principles, as well as additional disclosures necessary for the complete understanding of the financial statements presented. The report should also include a narrative discussion to explain how the town’s current financial position and results of operations compare with the prior year and with the budget (management discussion and analysis). It may also be helpful to provide statistical data over a ten-year period to provide a longer-term trend analysis of financial changes.

Publication Date
06/11/2026

Local Option Tax

Adopting a Local Option Tax (LOT) creates a dedicated local revenue source that can reduce pressure on property taxes and help fund local priorities. For many communities this can help balance the financial responsibility for maintaining its municipal infrastructure and amenities without placing added property tax burden on its residents.  In Vermont, municipalities can adopt local option taxes on sales, meals, alcohol, and rooms (hotel/lodging), but only after voter approval. The information that follows will help you understand what Local Option Tax is and if it is something you want to adopt for your municipality. 

Background:

For many years, Vermont municipalities needed both voter approval and special authorization from the Legislature (often through charter changes) to adopt local option tax(es).  This made adoption burdensome, slow, and inconsistent throughout the state.  Most commonly, it was the communities with strong tourism economies, and typically more staff capacity, that pursued local option taxes – nonresidents and visitors would be the major contributors to this revenue source. 

During the 2024 legislative session, VLCT advanced a long-held municipal priority: authorizing all municipalities to adopt a local option tax (of one percent (1%) on sales, rooms, and/or meals) through a vote at an annual or special town meeting.  Municipalities can now choose to approve all three, none, or any combination of local option taxes to address municipal revenue needs – they choose, not the legislature. The authorization includes a relief valve that allows the Vermont Tax Commissioner to reject or delay implementation of any more than five (5) new municipal local option taxes in a calendar year.

What is Local Option Tax?

Local Option Tax (LOT) is a way for municipalities in Vermont to raise additional revenue. A municipality may vote to levy the following 1% Local Option Taxes in addition to state business taxes:

  • 1% local option tax on sales, in addition to the State’s 6% sales tax rate 
  • 1% local option tax on meals and alcoholic beverages, in addition to the State’s 9% meals tax and 10% alcoholic beverage tax rates. If adopted, both meals and alcoholic beverages must be subject to LOT. A municipality wishing to adopt a LOT on meals must also adopt the LOT on alcoholic beverages, and vice versa. 
  • 1% local option tax on rooms in addition to the State’s 9% rooms tax rate
  • Local Option Tax does not apply to the sale or rental of motor vehicles which are subject to the motor vehicle purchase and use tax.
  • LOT on sales applies only to sales of items that are subject to the Vermont sales tax.
Why Adopt Local Option Tax(es)?

Since the 2024 legislative change, there has been a noticeable increase in towns considering local option taxes. Communities cite several reasons:

  • Rising infrastructure costs 
  • Flood recovery and climate resilience needs 
  • Public safety and capital projects 
  • Desire to reduce pressure on property taxes 
  • Less federal and state grant programs available to fund local priorities
  • Ability to collect revenue from tourists and visitors
  • Keeps revenue local
  • Provides budget flexibility

 

LOT Frequently Asked Questions

Maybe! Find out by using the Local Option Tax Finder

The Vermont Dept. of Taxes has a handy, easy to use “How To” guide.  

A standout member example:  Local Option Tax | Morristown, VT

Yes!  VLCT's Municipal Assistance Center has developed several model articles to help municipalities draft their town meeting warnings, among them is one for local option tax(es). It can be found on our Model Town Meeting Articles Resource page.  Scroll down to the "Budget Articles" section to find it.

Publication Date
06/01/2026

CHIP FAQs - Eligible Costs

CHIP funding can only be used for certain project and administrative costs that meet program rules. Knowing which expenses are eligible can help municipalities and developers plan projects, prepare budgets, and avoid delays during the application process. The information below explains the types of costs that may qualify for CHIP support and which expenses may not be covered.

VEPC's CHIP webpage may have additional FAQs related to this topic.

 

Improvements may include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Utilities, such as power distribution and transmission lines and conduit, telecommunications lines and conduit, telecommunications towers, digital infrastructure, and power or telecommunications equipment; drinking water, wastewater, and storm water, infrastructure including: water sources; green and gray stormwater practices; distribution/collection and conveyance piping and pump stations; and treatment systems, facilities, and regulatory required pertinent equipment.
  • Thermal energy networks, waste heat recovery, and community-scale geothermal.
  • Transportation improvements such as publicly accessible roads, streets, bridges, parking lots, facilities, garages, and structures, multimodal facilities, public transit stop equipment and amenities, street and sidewalk lighting, roundabouts, crosswalks and/or other pedestrian crossing treatments, traffic calming features, sidewalks, streetscapes, way-finding signs and kiosks; traffic signals, medians, turn lanes, and property acquired or used for right of way such as hiking and biking trails,  pathways to facilitate multimodal transportation, bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and bridges, street furnishings.
  • Site preparation for development or redevelopment including acquisition, demolition, environmental remediation of contaminated property, and mitigation of a flood-prone area.
  • “Soft costs” such as consulting, design, architects, engineering, accounting, legal, project management, associated application fees, or other professional services directly related to the implementation and construction of eligible site improvements.

No, CHIP does not include a proportionality component. Eligible improvements under CHIP are not required to be prorated to the housing development’s use of the infrastructure. However, a de-facto proration will be applied based on the potential increment the site could generate. The maximum that site could contribute to the improvement is the amount of new tax revenue the housing development will generate over the increment retention period. The critical piece is that the applicant must demonstrate the improvement is necessary to enable the CHIP housing development, regardless of how many other homes/businesses the improvement may support.

(Answer provided by VEPC staff)

No. A developer and housing development plan is required to prove housing benefit.

Publication Date
05/20/2026

CHIP FAQ - Tax Increment & Tax Increment Financing

Tax increment financing, often called TIF, is a tool that helps communities support public improvement projects and economic growth. CHIP projects may use tax increment financing to help pay for eligible infrastructure costs that enable housing development. Understanding how tax increment works for CHIP can help communities better plan projects, manage funding, and meet program requirements.

VEPC's CHIP webpage may have additional FAQs related to this topic.

Projects meeting certain affordability criteria are eligible to retain an additional 10 percent (10%) for a total of 85 percent (85%).

Tax increment may be retained for a period of up to twenty (20) years from the year in which debt is first incurred.

It depends on both the cost of the infrastructure and the amount of tax increment that will be generated by a housing development project. CHIP financing is used to close gaps in funding. The municipality and developer will need to determine what the gap is and whether the anticipated tax increment will close the gap fully.

The tax increment is calculated by subtracting the taxable value of the property on April 1 from the Original Taxable Value of the property.

Current Taxable Value – Original Taxable Value = Tax Increment

A tax increment financing plan must include:

  • a statement of costs and sources of revenue;
  • estimates of assessed values within the housing development site;
  • the portion of those assessed values to be applied to the Housing Infrastructure Project;
  • the resulting tax increments in each year of the financial plan and the lifetime education property tax increment retention;
  • the amount of bonded indebtedness or other financing to be incurred;
  • estimates of necessary principal, interest, costs of improvements, and related costs and in the event of municipal financing the amount anticipated to be approved by voters;
  • other sources of financing and anticipated revenues; and
  • the duration of the financial plan.

Yes. Grants, loans, and other funding can be used in combination with CHIP tax increment. However, if a grant is used to pay some or all of the cost of an eligible CHIP infrastructure improvement, the portion of the cost paid by the grant cannot be reimbursed through CHIP (no double dipping).

The OTV of a CHIP Housing Development Site is set on April 1 of the year the Site is approved by VEPC.

This means: 

  • If VEPC approves an application on 12/31/26, the OTV is the assessed value on 04/01/26.
  • If VEPC approves an application on 01/01/27, the OTV is the assessed value on 04/01/27.

The municipality must certify the Original Taxable Value of a CHIP Housing Development Site after VEPC approves the CHIP application.

Yes. However, municipalities should consider this carefully.

A tax stabilization agreement can help make a project financially feasible, especially for challenging or high-cost developments. In some cases, it may help a project move forward that otherwise would not happen.

At the same time, a tax stabilization agreement may reduce or delay the increase in property tax revenue that CHIP relies on to fund infrastructure improvements. This can affect project financing and make administration of the CHIP district more complicated.

Communities also should consider public perception issues, such as fairness, transparency, and the long-term impact on the tax base.

A key question to ask is: Would a smaller or delayed tax increment with a stabilization agreement be better than no project (and no increment) at all?

No. This is not a statutory duty of listers.

Depending on the project’s complexity, projections may be developed or reviewed by:

  • A municipal assessor (if they have the necessary experience).
  • A contracted assessor or appraisal professional.
  • A financial or economic consultant with TIF experience.
  • A real estate market consultant.
  • The project developer, subject to municipal review and verification.

Although a developer may prepare an initial projection, the municipality should independently evaluate the assumptions before relying on them. Because projected future development value affects tax increment estimates, bonding decisions, and the overall financial feasibility of the CHIP project, municipalities should be comfortable that the assumptions are reasonable and supported by evidence.

VLCT recommends conservative forecasting of the future development value. It also can be helpful to forecast expected and optimistic scenarios for comparison.

Publication Date
05/20/2026

CHIP FAQs - Debt

Many CHIP projects involve borrowing funds to pay for important infrastructure improvements. Understanding how debt works can help municipalities make informed financial decisions and plan for future costs. The information below explains how debt may be used in CHIP projects and what municipalities should consider before taking on financial obligations.

VEPC's CHIP webpage may have additional FAQs related to this topic.

Sponsors may incur debt eligible for tax increment financing for a period of up to five years following creation of the housing development site. VEPC may extend this for up to three years.

Calendar year. 

For example, if the CHIP starts 04/01/26, the municipality has until 03/30/31 to incur debt.

No. Debt eligible for tax increment financing cannot be incurred until the Housing Development Site is approved by VEPC.

Yes, municipal voters must approve each instance of municipal borrowing in a warned vote. 

Information that must be provided to the public includes:

  • The amount and type of debt and related costs to be incurred including, principal, interest, and fees,
  • The term of the debt,
  • The Housing Infrastructure Project to be financed,
  • The Housing Development Project that will occur due to the Housing Infrastructure Project,
  • A public notice that if the tax increment received is insufficient to pay debt costs in any year, the municipality remains liable for the debt, and
  • If interfund loans within the municipality are used, the information must include the terms and condition of the loan.

In the event of municipal financing, the first issuance of debt must be incurred within five years of CHIP site creation (April 1 in the year the application was approved by VEPC). VEPC may issue an extension for up to three years (for a total of eight years). 

Allowed instruments include bonds, loans, interfund loans (interest-free), and bond anticipation notes.

Bond anticipation notes or other forms of temporary financing may not be used as a first incurrence of debt.

The underwriter for the bonds will specify the conditions that must be met to sell bonds for the project, accounting for prevailing market conditions. Vermont municipalities are encouraged to reach out to Ken Linge at the Vermont Bond Bank to identify what specific requirements might apply in their case. His email address is ken@vtbondagency.org

Publication Date
05/20/2026